📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokensLearn more →1/10

Measurement sources and verification status (10 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 160

latency: 0.32

contextWindow: 1048576

benchmarkMmlu: 85.8

benchmarkHumanEval: 88

benchmarkMath: 85

benchmarkGpqa: 62

reasoningScore: 74

codingScore: 88

benchmarkSweBench: 42

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google🔒 Proprietary

Published Humanity’s Last Exam leaderboard evidence.

LLM Stats Scores

74.0

Reasoning

88.0

Coding

🎯

62.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy

Published benchmark evidence

Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.

View HLE source ↗

4.3%

Humanity's Last Exam

42.0%

SWE-bench

Quality Score

80.0

Overall (0–100)

Speed

160 c/s

characters/second

Latency (TTFT)

0.32s

to first token

Input Price

—

per 1M tokens

Output Price

—

per 1M tokens

Context Window

tokens

Release Date

2024-12

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy

What do these benchmarks test?

🎯

GPQA Diamond62.0%Below avg

Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.

🧠

MMLU85.8%Solid

The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.

💻

HumanEval88.0%Solid

Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.

∑

MATH Benchmark85.0%Top tier

Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.