📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokens1/10
Measurement sources and verification status (10 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 160
latency: 0.38
contextWindow: 131072
benchmarkMmlu: 81.2
benchmarkHumanEval: 92.7
benchmarkMath: 81
benchmarkGpqa: 48
reasoningScore: 65
codingScore: 92.7
benchmarkSweBench: 51
Q

Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct

qwen🔒 Proprietary

Published Humanity’s Last Exam leaderboard evidence.

6.8
LLM Stats Scores
65.0
Reasoning
92.7
Coding
🎯
48.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy
Published benchmark evidence
Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.
View HLE source ↗
4.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
51.0%
SWE-bench
Quality Score
76.0
Overall (0–100)
Speed
160 c/s
characters/second
Latency (TTFT)
0.38s
to first token
Input Price
—
per 1M tokens
Output Price
—
per 1M tokens
Context Window
131K
tokens
Release Date
2024-11

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy
0%25%50%75%100%GPQA ◆MMLUHumanEvalMATH48.0%81.2%92.7%81.0%
What do these benchmarks test?
🎯
GPQA Diamond48.0%Below avg
Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.
🧠
MMLU81.2%Solid
The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.
💻
HumanEval92.7%Top tier
Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.
∑
MATH Benchmark81.0%Top tier
Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.

💰 Cost Calculator

Pricing not available for this model.

AI Score

Powered by Groq
5.6/10

"Good for code generation at 7B size but lags behind larger rivals"

🤖 AI Analysis