📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokensLearn more →1/10

Measurement sources and verification status (14 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 80

latency: 0.42

contextWindow: 131072

inputPrice: 0.72

outputPrice: 0.72

benchmarkMmlu: 83.6

benchmarkHumanEval: 86

benchmarkMath: 68

benchmarkHellaSwag: 86.6

benchmarkGpqa: 40.3

benchmarkMmluPro: 56

reasoningScore: 57

codingScore: 80.5

benchmarkSweBench: 34

Meta: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

meta-llama🔒 Proprietary

LLM Stats Scores

57.0

Reasoning

80.5

Coding

🎯

40.3%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy

56.0%MMLU-Pro

Published benchmark evidence

Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.

View HLE source ↗

4.5%

Humanity's Last Exam

34.0%

SWE-bench

Quality Score

70.0

Overall (0–100)

Speed

80 c/s

characters/second

Latency (TTFT)

0.42s

to first token

Input Price

$0.72

per 1M tokens

Output Price

$0.72

per 1M tokens

Context Window

131K

tokens

Release Date

2024-07-23

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy

What do these benchmarks test?

🎯

GPQA Diamond40.3%Below avg

Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.

📚

MMLU-Pro56.0%Below avg

The harder successor to MMLU — more options per question eliminate single-answer guessing. Tests depth of professional knowledge across 14 disciplines.

🧠

MMLU83.6%Solid

The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.

💻

HumanEval86.0%Solid

Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.

∑

MATH Benchmark68.0%Solid

Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.

🌐

HellaSwag86.6%Solid

Tests grounded, everyday common sense rather than memorised facts. Most frontier models now score 90%+, so it best separates small/mid models from large ones.