📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokensLearn more →1/10

Measurement sources and verification status (14 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 160

latency: 0.26

contextWindow: 131072

inputPrice: 0.02

outputPrice: 0.04

benchmarkMmlu: 73

benchmarkHumanEval: 72.6

benchmarkMath: 56.7

benchmarkHellaSwag: 82

benchmarkGpqa: 28

benchmarkMmluPro: 48

reasoningScore: 42

codingScore: 72.6

benchmarkSweBench: 21

Meta: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

meta-llama🔒 Proprietary

LLM Stats Scores

42.0

Reasoning

72.6

Coding

🎯

28.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy

48.0%MMLU-Pro

Published benchmark evidence

Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.

View HLE source ↗

5.3%

Humanity's Last Exam

21.0%

SWE-bench

Quality Score

58.0

Overall (0–100)

Speed

160 c/s

characters/second

Latency (TTFT)

0.26s

to first token

Input Price

$0.02

per 1M tokens

Output Price

$0.04

per 1M tokens

Context Window

131K

tokens

Release Date

2024-07-23

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy

What do these benchmarks test?

🎯

GPQA Diamond28.0%Below avg

Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.

📚

MMLU-Pro48.0%Below avg

The harder successor to MMLU — more options per question eliminate single-answer guessing. Tests depth of professional knowledge across 14 disciplines.

🧠

MMLU73.0%Below avg

The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.

💻

HumanEval72.6%Below avg

Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.

∑

MATH Benchmark56.7%Below avg

Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.

🌐

HellaSwag82.0%Below avg

Tests grounded, everyday common sense rather than memorised facts. Most frontier models now score 90%+, so it best separates small/mid models from large ones.