📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokensLearn more →1/10

Measurement sources and verification status (14 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 160

latency: 0.65

contextWindow: 1047576

inputPrice: 0.4

outputPrice: 1.6

benchmarkMmlu: 83

benchmarkHumanEval: 88

benchmarkMath: 72

benchmarkHellaSwag: 88

benchmarkGpqa: 38

benchmarkMmluPro: 64

reasoningScore: 61

codingScore: 85

benchmarkSweBench: 32

OpenAI: GPT-4.1 Mini

openai🔒 Proprietary

LLM Stats Scores

61.0

Reasoning

85.0

Coding

🎯

38.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy

64.0%MMLU-Pro

Published benchmark evidence

Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.

View HLE source ↗

5.0%

Humanity's Last Exam

32.0%

SWE-bench

BenchLM performance measurements

Published output speed and first-token timing, kept separate from provider pricing and other benchmark sources.

View source ↗

Output speed

tokens / second

TTFT

0.76s

BenchLM measured

Collected 11/11/2026

Quality Score

73.0

Overall (0–100)

Speed

160 c/s

characters/second

Latency (TTFT)

0.65s

to first token

Input Price

$0.4

per 1M tokens

Output Price

$1.6

per 1M tokens

Context Window

tokens

Release Date

2025-Q1

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy

What do these benchmarks test?

🎯

GPQA Diamond38.0%Below avg

Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.

📚

MMLU-Pro64.0%Below avg

The harder successor to MMLU — more options per question eliminate single-answer guessing. Tests depth of professional knowledge across 14 disciplines.

🧠

MMLU83.0%Solid

The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.

💻

HumanEval88.0%Solid

Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.

∑

MATH Benchmark72.0%Solid

Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.

🌐

HellaSwag88.0%Solid

Tests grounded, everyday common sense rather than memorised facts. Most frontier models now score 90%+, so it best separates small/mid models from large ones.