📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokensLearn more →1/10

Measurement sources and verification status (12 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 100

latency: 0.45

contextWindow: 128000

inputPrice: 2.5

outputPrice: 10

benchmarkMmlu: 88.7

benchmarkHumanEval: 90.2

benchmarkMath: 76.6

benchmarkGpqa: 44

reasoningScore: 70

codingScore: 68

benchmarkSweBench: 38.8

OpenAI: GPT-4o Search Preview

openai🔒 Proprietary

GPT-4o Search Previewis a specialized model for web search in Chat Completions. It is trained to understand and execute web search queries.

LLM Stats Scores

70.0

Reasoning

68.0

Coding

🎯

44.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy

Published benchmark evidence

Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.

38.8%

SWE-bench

Quality Score

72.0

Overall (0–100)

Speed

100 c/s

characters/second

Latency (TTFT)

0.45s

to first token

Input Price

$2.5

per 1M tokens

Output Price

$10

per 1M tokens

Context Window

128K

tokens

Release Date

2024-05

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy

What do these benchmarks test?

🎯

GPQA Diamond44.0%Below avg

Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.

🧠

MMLU88.7%Top tier

The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.

💻

HumanEval90.2%Top tier

Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.

∑

MATH Benchmark76.6%Solid

Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.