📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokens1/10
Measurement sources and verification status (13 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 160
latency: 0.28
contextWindow: 200000
inputPrice: 1.1
outputPrice: 4.4
benchmarkMmlu: 91.5
benchmarkHumanEval: 92.7
benchmarkMath: 97.5
benchmarkHellaSwag: 90
benchmarkGpqa: 80
benchmarkMmluPro: 80
reasoningScore: 57
codingScore: 68

OpenAI: o4 Mini High

openai🔒 Proprietary
6.2
LLM Stats Scores
57.0
Reasoning
68.0
Coding
🎯
80.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy
80.0%MMLU-Pro
Quality Score
63.0
Overall (0–100)
Speed
160 c/s
characters/second
Latency (TTFT)
0.28s
to first token
Input Price
$1.1
per 1M tokens
Output Price
$4.4
per 1M tokens
Context Window
200K
tokens
Release Date
2025-04-16

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy
0%25%50%75%100%GPQA ◆MMLU-ProMMLUHumanEvalMATHHellaSwag80.0%80.0%91.5%92.7%97.5%90.0%
What do these benchmarks test?
🎯
GPQA Diamond80.0%Solid
Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.
📚
MMLU-Pro80.0%Top tier
The harder successor to MMLU — more options per question eliminate single-answer guessing. Tests depth of professional knowledge across 14 disciplines.
🧠
MMLU91.5%Top tier
The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.
💻
HumanEval92.7%Top tier
Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.
∑
MATH Benchmark97.5%Top tier
Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.
🌐
HellaSwag90.0%Solid
Tests grounded, everyday common sense rather than memorised facts. Most frontier models now score 90%+, so it best separates small/mid models from large ones.

💰 Cost Calculator

Input cost
$1.10
Output cost
$2.20
Total / month
$3.30
Annual cost
$39.60
Input: $1.1/1M
Output: $4.4/1M
Rate: 1 USD = 1.00 USD · 2026-11-10
0.7% pricier than average
Cheaper alternatives:
Z.ai: GLM 5.2$0.007/1M · Q73

AI Score

Powered by Groq
6.8/10

"Higher‑quality O4 variant offers solid results at a premium price, good for specialized use cases."

🤖 AI Analysis