📡 LLM Pulse|🆕 New on leaderboard: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 by Baidu — $1.13/M tokensLearn more →1/10

Measurement sources and verification status (12 fields)

Collected third-party figures are not independent tests. A source link and collection date do not establish reproducibility. Exact model version, dataset and test settings may be missing. No independent verification date is supplied.

speed: 210

latency: 0.48

contextWindow: 131072

inputPrice: 0.3

outputPrice: 0.5

benchmarkMmlu: 87

benchmarkHumanEval: 88.5

benchmarkMath: 90.5

benchmarkGpqa: 68

reasoningScore: 75

codingScore: 70

benchmarkSweBench: 45

xAI: Grok 3 Mini

xAI🔒 Proprietary

xAI's compact thinking model with fast reasoning at low cost.

LLM Stats Scores

75.0

Reasoning

70.0

Coding

🎯

68.0%GPQA Diamond — graduate-level science accuracy

Published benchmark evidence

Task scores are reported independently by each publisher; they are not combined into a hidden quality score.

View HLE source ↗

11.0%

Humanity's Last Exam

45.0%

SWE-bench

BenchLM performance measurements

Published output speed and first-token timing, kept separate from provider pricing and other benchmark sources.

View source ↗

Output speed

tokens / second

TTFT

25.69s

BenchLM measured

Collected 8/22/2026

Quality Score

72.0

Overall (0–100)

Speed

210 c/s

characters/second

Latency (TTFT)

0.48s

to first token

Input Price

$0.3

per 1M tokens

Output Price

$0.5

per 1M tokens

Context Window

131K

tokens

Release Date

2025-Q1

30-Day Rank History

📊 Benchmark Scores

Reported scores · % accuracy

What do these benchmarks test?

🎯

GPQA Diamond68.0%Below avg

Designed so that even PhD-level human experts average ~65–70%. A score above 80% signals near-expert scientific reasoning that goes far beyond memorisation.

🧠

MMLU87.0%Top tier

The classic academic breadth benchmark. Top frontier models now score above 85%, so it best distinguishes mid-tier from strong generalist models.

💻

HumanEval88.5%Solid

Measures whether a model writes functionally correct code — not just plausible-looking syntax. Strong scores (>85%) indicate reliable day-to-day coding assistance.

∑

MATH Benchmark90.5%Top tier

Tests multi-step mathematical reasoning under strict correctness. Even a 60% score requires strong chain-of-thought; top reasoning models now exceed 90%.